Recently, I have invested a big sum of money into a ultra-wide angle lens, the Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0635b/0635bfc03fea709e7312d4a8dc38e36634a37867" alt=""
This is "piece of glass" cost me S$1100
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d97c/8d97c60f53cd001f05b9992dbeeec8695bf9a81e" alt=""
Very beautiful lens
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4474/c4474f5c377bf45978fd93d160f282953d7fab3c" alt=""
It has a bulbous front element
What review said that made me buy this lens:
-Ultra-wide focal length! (The 2mm really makes a difference)
-Low Chromatic Aberration (Better than Canon's 10-22mm)
-Sharp (As sharp as Canon's 10-22mm)
-HSM = Quick auto-focusing (Doesn't make a difference in landscape photography)
-Comes with a casing and hood (All Sigma lens comes with that)
-Cheaper by S$200
-Ultra-wide focal length! (The 2mm really makes a difference)
-Low Chromatic Aberration (Better than Canon's 10-22mm)
-Sharp (As sharp as Canon's 10-22mm)
-HSM = Quick auto-focusing (Doesn't make a difference in landscape photography)
-Comes with a casing and hood (All Sigma lens comes with that)
-Cheaper by S$200
Why I shouldn't have bought this lens:
-Not able to accept filters (No ND/ Graduated ND)
-Bulbous front element (Hard to care)
-Slow aperture (2/3 stops slower than Canon's 10-22mm)
-Not able to accept filters (No ND/ Graduated ND)
-Bulbous front element (Hard to care)
-Slow aperture (2/3 stops slower than Canon's 10-22mm)
Would post more about my experience with this lens....
No comments:
Post a Comment